Monitoring an activity and determining the type of actor performing the activity

ABSTRACT

Determining a type of actor performing an activity includes monitoring the performance of the activity via at least one sensor to produce activity readings over a dimension. The activity readings are then compared to reference readings that are generated based on a machine performing same activity. The comparison of the reference readings to the activity readings is used to determine a variance between the activity readings and reference readings. Once the variance is determined, the variance is compared with a threshold value to determine the type of actor performing the activity.

BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field

Present invention embodiments relate to the monitoring and analyzationof an entity performing an activity, and more specifically, determiningwhether the entity performing the activity is receiving inputs from anorganism or a machine.

2. Discussion of the Related Art

As the Internet of Things (IoT) expands to include all sorts of devices,such as kitchen appliances, fitness trackers, alarm clocks, thermostats,vehicles, etc., an immense amount of data is being collected andexchanged. The IoT allows these devices to be sensed and/or controlledremotely across existing network infrastructure, creating opportunitiesfor more direct integration of the physical world into computer-basedsystems, and resulting in improved efficiency, accuracy, and economicbenefit. Because these devices have network connectivity, these devicesmay be controlled by either a machine or by a human, thereby raisingsecurity and safety issues.

Further, devices are becoming more automated and mainstream in theeveryday lives of people. However, humans may not be entirelycomfortable with the use of automated devices.

SUMMARY

According to one embodiment of the present invention, determining a typeof actor performing an activity includes monitoring the performance ofthe activity, via a sensor, to produce activity readings over adimension. Furthermore, the activity readings are compared to referencereadings that are generated based on a machine performing the sameactivity to determine a variance between the activity readings and thereference readings. Finally, the type of actor performing the activityis determined based on a comparison of the variance value with athreshold value. Embodiments of the present invention further include anapparatus and computer program product for determining a type of actorperforming an activity in substantially the same manner described above.

Present invention embodiments determine whether an actor performing anactivity is a machine or an organism (e.g., a human) based on thebehavior or performance of the activity by an entity. The presentinvention embodiments also enable a machine actor to perform an activityin a manner or behavior that simulates the performance or behavior of ahuman performing the activity.

Present invention embodiments may further include various other aspects.For example, the activity performed includes at least one of operating avehicle, operating a computer system to access data, and operating aninterface to access a device. In addition, present inventionembodiments, in determining the variance, includes analyzing theactivity and reference reading to define patterns. Present inventionembodiments further include producing a confidence level for thedetermined type of actor.

Moreover, present invention embodiments may include adding randomizedelements to the reference readings based on a probability distributionto produce simulated readings of the activity performed by an organism.Additionally, the dimension over which the performance of the activityis monitored includes one of time, a distance, and/or a path.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Generally, like reference numerals in the various figures are utilizedto designate like components.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example environment in which the present generalinventive concept can be embodied.

FIG. 2 is a procedural flowchart of determining the actor performing anactivity based on the behavior of an entity, according to one presentinvention embodiment.

FIG. 3A depicts an example of a path taken by a vehicle travelingbetween two points, the vehicle receiving control inputs from a human,according to one present invention embodiment.

FIG. 3B depicts an example of a path taken by a vehicle travelingbetween two points, the vehicle receiving control inputs from a machine,according to one present invention embodiment.

FIG. 3C depicts a comparison of the path taken by the vehicle receivingcontrol inputs from the human illustrated in FIG. 3A with the path takenby the vehicle receiving control inputs from the machine illustrated inFIG. 3B.

FIG. 4 is a procedural flowchart of a machine simulating human behaviorof an entity performing an activity, according to one present inventionembodiment.

FIG. 5 is a procedural flow chart of determining a type of actorperforming an activity according to a present invention embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Presented herein are techniques for determining the type of actorperforming an activity. Generally, the techniques provided hereinutilize sensors or sensor devices to monitor the performance andbehavior of a device or system. The sensors may measure variousperformance characteristics over various dimensions. Once the sensorscollect data of the monitored device or system, a reference reading iscalculated based on a machine performing the same activity as themonitored device. The present invention embodiment then compares themeasured activity readings to the calculated reference readings andcalculates a variance, if any, between the measured activity readingsand the calculated reference readings. Once the variance is calculated,the variance is compared to a predetermined threshold value orcalculated threshold value to determine the type of actor performing anactivity. When the calculated variance exceeds the threshold value, thepresent invention embodiment may determine that the actor performing theactivity is a human. Conversely, when the calculated variance does notexceed the threshold value, the present invention embodiment maydetermine that the actor performing the activity is a machine.

The techniques presented herein may also be utilized to cause anautomated device or system to simulate being operated by a human.Generally, the present invention embodiment creates a calculatedexpected machine based behavior for the performance of an activity. Thepresent invention embodiment then modifies the calculated expectedmachine based behavior by imparting noise or random elements to create amodified machine based behavior. The present invention embodimentimparts enough noise or random elements that the modified machine basedbehavior has a variance, when compared to the calculated expectedmachine based behavior, that exceeds the threshold value, and thussimulates human based behavior for the activity.

These techniques create an additional layer of security and safety fordevices and systems, especially with enhanced connectivity (i.e., theInternet of Things). Moreover, the techniques provided herein alsoprovide the ability to make devices act more like humans to make humansmore comfortable when interacting with the automated devices, especiallythose that may invoke fear among humans.

An example computing environment for use with present inventionembodiments is illustrated in FIG. 1. Specifically, the computingenvironment includes one or more server systems 10, and one or moreclient systems 20. Server systems 10 and client systems 20 may be remotefrom each other and communicate over a network 30. The network may beimplemented by any number of any suitable communications media (e.g.,wide area network (WAN), local area network (LAN), Internet, Intranet,etc.). Alternatively, server systems 10 and client systems 20 may belocal to each other, and communicate via any appropriate localcommunication medium (e.g., local area network (LAN), hardwire, wirelesslink, Intranet, etc.). By way of example only, the computing environmentmay implement an internet of things (IoT) type environment.

Server systems 10 may be implemented by any conventional or othercomputer systems preferably equipped with a display or monitor, a base(e.g., including at least one CPU or processor 12, one or more memories16 and/or internal or external network interfaces or communicationsdevices 14 (e.g., modem, network cards, etc.)), optional input devices(e.g., a keyboard, mouse or other input device), and any commerciallyavailable and custom software (e.g., server/communications software,behavior analysis module 18, actor determination module 19, etc.).

Client systems 20 may be preferably equipped with at least one CPU orprocessor 12, one or more memories 16, internal or external networkinterfaces or communications devices 14 (e.g., transceiver, networkcards, etc.)), and/or optional input or output devices (e.g., akeyboard, mouse or other input device, a display, etc.). The clientsystems 20 may further include any commercially available or customsoftware and/or hardware modules for the particular device to performdevice operations (e.g., applications, browser, communications software,behavior collection module 22, activity performance module 24, etc.).Client systems 20 may communicate with server systems 10 for determininga type of actor performing an activity, as described below.

As further illustrated, client systems 20 may include any suitablesensor devices that may sense, collect, and/or provide data (e.g., asensor (e.g., utility, medical, physiological, weather, alarm, externalconditions, device internal conditions, meter, etc.), a devicecontaining a sensor or otherwise collecting data, measurements, and/orreadings (e.g., desktop or portable computer system, portable processingdevice, cellular telephone, appliance, vehicle, medical device, meters,exercise machine or device, etc.), etc.). The suitable sensor devicesmay be internal sensor devices 26 or external sensor devices 28. Theexternal sensor devices 28 may communicate with the client systems 20via any appropriate communication medium (e.g., local area network(LAN), wide area network (WAN), Internet, hardwire, wireless link,Intranet, etc.). This data may be stored internally on the clientsystems 20 and/or shared across network 30. The internal sensor devices26 and the external sensor devices 28 may be configured to collect anytype of data, including, but not limited to, location, velocity,temperature, altitude, etc.

Client systems 20 may alternatively include, or be coupled to, one ormore performing devices 40 (e.g., vehicle, mobile device, server system,etc.), so that the client systems 20 may monitor the performing devices40 as the performing devices 40 perform an activity. The performingdevices 40 may similarly be preferably equipped with at least one CPU orprocessor 12, one or more memories 16, internal or external networkinterfaces or communications devices 14 (e.g., transceiver, networkcards, etc.)), and/or optional input or output devices (e.g., akeyboard, mouse or other input device, a display, etc.). The performingdevices 40 may further include any commercially available and customsoftware and/or hardware modules to perform device operations andactivities (e.g., applications, communications software, activityperformance module 42, etc.).

The client systems 20 include a behavior collection module 22 and anactivity performance module 24. Behavior collection module 22 utilizesthe internal sensor devices 26 and the external sensor devices 28 tomonitor and collect data of the client systems 20 and/or the performancedevices 40. The behavior collection module 22 further enables the clientsystems 20 to send the collected behavior data to the server systems 10via the network 30. Activity performance module 24 enables the clientsystems 20 to perform a desired activity in which the outcome is knownto the server systems 10. For example, if one or more client systems 20are in the form of a client or end-user computer system used to accessdata through a security system by entering a password via the clientsystems 20, the activity performance module 24 enables a user to enterthe required password to access the data protected by the securitysystem. In another example, if the one or more client systems 20 areintegrated into a vehicle, the activity performance module 24 enables auser (e.g., local or remote) to enter control parameters (e.g.,velocity, positioning, etc.) of the vehicle via various vehicle inputcontrol systems (e.g., drive by wire, throttle by wire, brake by wire,shift by wire, steer by wire, etc.) of the vehicle or via a devicelinked to the vehicle systems (e.g., mobile device, computer system,etc.).

The performing devices 40 also include an activity performance module42. Similar to the client systems 20, the activity performance module 42enables the performing devices 40 to perform a desired activity in whichthe outcome is known to the server systems 10. For example, if the oneor more performing devices 40 are a vehicle or are integrated into avehicle, the activity performance module 42 enables a user (e.g., localor remote) to enter control parameters (e.g., velocity, positioning,etc.) of the vehicle via various vehicle input control systems (e.g.,drive by wire, throttle by wire, brake by wire, shift by wire, steer bywire, etc.) of the vehicle or via a device linked to the vehicle systems(e.g., mobile device, computer system, etc.).

The client systems 20 may enable the monitoring of the performance of anactivity by either the client systems 20 or the performing device 40 viathe internal sensor devices 26 or external sensor device 28. The clientsystems 20 may further enable a user to communicate with one or moreserver systems 10 to provide the data collected from the sensor devices26, 28 and receive actor determination results with regard to thecollected data. For example, one or more client systems 20 may be in theform of a client or end-user computer system that may be used to accessdata through a security system by entering a password via the clientsystems 20. The internal sensor device 26 may detect the speed in whicha password is entered via the client systems 20. The detected speed datamay be sent to the server systems 10 for the server system 10 to make adetermination as to whether or not the attempted access of the data wasmachine generated or human generated. In another example, one or moreclient systems 20 may be in the form of a vehicle traveling along aroad, and the performing device 40 may be another vehicle in proximityto the client systems 20 that is also traveling along the same road. Theclient systems 20 may monitor the performing device 40 via the externalsensor devices 28, where the client systems 20 may collect data relatingto the speed of the performing device 40 and the positioning of theperforming device 40 within a lane. The detected speed data and lanepositioning data may be sent to the server systems 10 for the serversystems 10 to make a determination as to whether or not the performingdevice 40 is being controlled by a machine (i.e., a self-driving car) ora human.

The server systems 10 include a behavior analysis module 18 and an actordetermination module 19. As further detailed below, behavior analysismodule 18 enables the server systems 10 to compare the data receivedfrom the client systems 20 via the network 30 with a machine expectedperformance of the same or similar activity. A database system 17 maystore various types of data (e.g., machine generated paths, machinegenerated velocities, machine generated distances, etc.) for thebehavior analysis of the collected data for designated activities. Thedatabase system 17 may be implemented by any conventional or otherdatabase or storage unit, may be local to or remote from server systems10, and may communicate via any appropriate communication medium (e.g.,local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), Internet, hardwire,wireless link, Intranet, etc.). The behavior analysis module 18 maycalculate, from data stored in the database 17, the expected performanceof a machine for a specific activity, and then may compare the dataacquired from the client systems 20 to the calculated expectedperformance of the machine to determine a variance. The actordetermination module 19 enables the server systems 10 to determine,based on the calculated variance from the behavior analysis module 18,whether or not the actor performing the detected activity is an organism(e.g., human) or a machine.

Behavior analysis module 18, actor determination module 19, behaviorcollection module 22, and activity performance modules 24, 42 mayinclude one or more modules or units to perform the various functions ofpresent invention embodiments described below. The various modules(e.g., behavior analysis module 18, actor determination module 19,behavior collection module 22, and activity performance modules 24, 42,etc.) may be implemented by any combination of any quantity of softwareand/or hardware modules or units, and may reside within memory 16 of theserver systems 10, client systems 20, and performing devices 40 forexecution by a corresponding processor 12.

With reference now to FIG. 2, procedural flow chart 200 depictsoperations (e.g., of behavior analysis module 18 and actor determinationmodule 19) for determining the type of actor performing an activity.Initially, at step 202, the server systems 10 receive the measuredbehavior data from the client systems 20 via the network 30. Themeasured behavior data is collected by the internal sensor devices 26and/or external sensor devices 28. The internal sensor devices 26 and/orexternal sensor devices 28 of the client systems 20 may be utilized bythe client systems 20 to measure the performance of an activity by theclient systems 20 via the activity performance module 24 and/or theperforming devices 40 via the activity performance module 42. Forexample, in some present invention embodiments the client systems 20 mayperform the activity measured by the sensor devices 26, 28, where inother present invention embodiments, the performing devices 40 mayperform the activity measured by the sensor devices 26, 28. In evenother present invention embodiments, the client systems 20 and theperforming devices 40 may simultaneously perform the activities measuredby the sensor devices 26, 28.

The data measured by the internal sensor devices 26 and the externalsensor devices 28 may be measured over a known path, a set distance, ora set time period. In one present invention embodiment, when theinternal sensor devices 26 and the external sensor devices 28 aredetecting the client systems 20 and the performing devices 40 travelingalong a support surface (i.e., as vehicles), the sensor devices 26, 28are configured to track the path over which the client systems 20 andthe performing devices 40 travel along a known path (i.e., tracking thepath a vehicle takes along the lane of a road). In this presentinvention embodiment, the data set of the path may be a combination ofpositioning data points. In another present invention embodiment,internal sensor devices 26 and the external sensor devices 28 detect theclient systems 20 and the performing devices 40 traveling along asupport surface (i.e., as vehicles), where the sensor devices 26, 28 areconfigured to detect the velocity, including any variations in velocity,at which the client systems 20 and the performing devices 40 travelalong the support surface. In addition, when the internal sensor devices26 and the external sensor devices 28 are detecting the input of datainto the client systems 20, the internal sensor devices 26 areconfigured to detect the speed or amount of time the data is input intothe client systems 20.

At step 204, the server systems 10 calculate the expected machine basedbehavior for the activity measured by the sensor devices 26, 28 of theclient systems 20. The behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems10 may calculate the expected machine based behavior for the activitymeasured by the sensor devices 26, 28 of the client systems 20 inmultiple ways. In one embodiment of the present invention, the serversystems 10 may have knowledge of the system or entity completing theactivity and/or knowledge of the activity being completed. The data ofthe system or entity and the data of the activity being completed mayboth be stored in the database 17. The sever systems 10 may access thedatabase 17 to acquire this data and information to calculate how amachine would perform or behave in completing the same measuredactivity. For example, when calculating the path a self-driving vehicle(e.g. a vehicle controlled by a machine/computer) would take between twopoints, the server systems 10 utilize the behavior analysis module 18 tocalculate the expected path of the self-driving vehicle along the road.

In another embodiment of the present invention, the behavior analysismodule 18 would take the measured data points from the measured behavioror performance of the entity completing the activity and apply a linear,curve, or function model utilizing the modeling methods of, but notlimited to, linear regression, a polynomial function, etc. In otherwords, the behavior analysis module 18 would apply a known method ofcalculating a mathematical model to a set of data points, where themathematical model represents the data points from the measured behavioror performance of the entity completing the activity.

Once the server systems 10 calculate the expected machine based behaviorfor the activity, at step 206, the server systems 10 calculate thedeviation or variance between the expected machine behavior and thebehavior measured by the sensor devices 26, 28 of the client systems 20.Thus, utilizing behavior analysis module 18, the server systems 10compare the measured behavior and performance of the entity (e.g.,client systems 20, performance devices 40, etc.) performing/completingthe activity to the calculated expected behavior of a machine performingor completing the activity with one of the entities. In comparing thetwo data sets, the behavior analysis module 18 calculates a variance orstandard deviation between the measured behavior and performance of theentity performing/completing the activity and the calculated expectedbehavior of a machine performing or completing the activity with one ofthe entities.

For example, when the activity being completed is the path a vehicletravels between two points, and the behavior analysis module 18 applieda curve fit line representing the calculated expected behavior of amachine performing/completing the activity to the data points of themeasured behavior and performance of the entity performing/completingthe activity, the behavior analysis module 18 assesses how close thecurve fit line fits the measured data points. In other words, thebehavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10 measures thedistance from the curve fit line of each of the data points, and, fromthose measurements, calculates the variance, and thus the standarddeviation, of the data points from the measured behavior and performanceof the entity performing/completing the activity with respect to theline representing the calculated expected behavior of a machineperforming/completing the activity. The larger the variance or standarddeviation, the greater the difference between the measured behavior andperformance of the entity performing/completing the activity and thecalculated expected behavior and performance of a machineperforming/completing the activity.

In another present invention embodiment, the server systems 10 mayutilize the behavior analysis module 18 to identify patterns in the dataset of the measured behavior and performance of the entityperforming/completing the activity. Typically, humans are unable torepeatedly complete the same activity in exactly the same manner.Conversely, machines and computers routinely complete the same activityin exactly the same manner. Thus, when the performance and behavior ofmachines and computers are measured, the measurements may reveal apattern or set of patterns for the completion of the activity. However,human performance and behavior is more random and includes morevariation. Thus, if, when utilizing the behavior analysis module 18, theserver systems 10 detect a pattern or set of patterns in the measuredbehavior or performance, the measured behavior or performance is morelikely to be controlled or implemented by a machine than a human.

At step 208, the server systems 10 utilize the actor determinationmodule 19 to compare the calculated variance to a predetermined variancevalue N. In one present invention embodiment, the predetermined variancevalue N may be approximately 2-3%±1%. The predetermined variance value Nmay be set by a user, or may be set by the server systems 10 based onthe activity being performed and measured. If the calculated variance Nexceeds the predetermined variance value N, then the actor determinationmodule 19 determines at step 210 that the actor controlling the entitybeing measured is a human. In other words, if the calculated variance Nexceeds the predetermined variance value of N, then the actordetermination module 19 determines that the measured behavior is humanbehavior. If the calculated variance N, however, does not exceed thepredetermined variance value of N, then the actor determination module19 determines at step 212 that the actor controlling the entity beingmeasured is a machine. In other words, if the calculated variance N doesnot exceed the predetermined variance value of N, then the actordetermination module 19 determines that the measured behavior is machinebehavior.

As the calculated variance value increases, the confidence level of theactor determination module 19 increases that the measured behavior isthat of a human. It then follows that as the calculated variance valueincreases, the confidence level of the actor determination module 19decreases that the measured behavior is that of a machine. Conversely,as the calculated variance value decrease, the confidence level of theactor determination module 19 decreases that the measured behavior isthat of a human. It further follows that as the calculated variancevalue decreases, the confidence level of the actor determination module19 increases that the measured behavior is that of a machine. Similarly,in one present invention embodiment, an increase of the standarddeviation, or higher values of the standard deviation, is correlatedwith an increase in the confidence level of the actor determinationmodule 19 that the measured behavior is that of a human, and a decreasein the confidence level of the actor determination module 19 that themeasured behavior is that of a machine. Conversely, a decrease of thestandard deviation, or smaller values of the standard deviation, iscorrelated with a decrease in the confidence level of the actordetermination module 19 that the measured behavior is that of a human,and an increase in the confidence level of the actor determinationmodule 19 that the measured behavior is that of a machine.

After the actor determination module 19 makes a determination that themeasured behavior is human behavior at step 210 or a determination thatthe measured behavior is machine behavior at step 212, the serversystems 10, at step 214, send the determination to the client systems 20to inform the client systems 20 as to whether the entity performing theactivity is being controlled by a machine or a human. The client systems20 may utilize the determination to take appropriate action. Forexample, when the client systems 20 and the performance devices 40 arevehicles, and the activity being monitored is that of the performancedevices 40 traveling along the same road on which the client systems 20are traveling, the determination as to whether or not the performancedevices 40 are controlled by machines or are controlled by humans maydetermine the actions taken by the client systems 20. When the clientsystems 20 are self-driving vehicles, and the determination is made thatthe performance devices 40 are also self-driving vehicles (i.e.,controlled by machines and exerting machine behavior), the clientsystems 20 can follow the performance devices 40 from closer distanceand at a faster speed than when the performance devices 40 are notself-driving vehicles (i.e., controlled by humans and exerting humanbehavior).

In another example, when the client systems 20 are a security system setup for access to data, and the sensor devices 26, 28 are configured tomeasure and monitor the input of data (i.e., passwords) into aninterface, the determination as to whether a machine or a human isentering the data may determine how the client systems 20 respond orreact to the received data. Because humans make errors when enteringdata, if a wrong password is entered, and the client systems 20 arenotified that the password is being entered by a human, the clientsystems 20 may still provide the human additional chances to enter thecorrect password. If a wrong password is entered, and the client systems20 are notified that the password is being entered by a machine, theclient systems 20 may make the determination that the attempted accessof the security system is malicious and may lock the machine out of thesecurity system while simultaneously blocking the internet protocol (IP)address of the entity attempting to access the security system.

In yet another example, when the client systems 20 are a mobile deviceconfigured to receive and allow human interactions, and the sensordevices 26, 28 are configured to measure and monitor the interactionswith the mobile device (i.e., swiping of the touch screen, depressing ofthe buttons, etc.), the determination as to whether a machine or a humanis attempting to interact with the mobile device may determine how theclient systems 20 respond or react to the interactions. If the clientsystems 20 receive interactions from a user, and the client systems 20are notified that the interactions are is being generated by a human,the client systems 20 will continue to allow and enable the human userto interact with the client systems 20. However, if the client systems20 are notified that the interactions received from a user are beinggenerated by a machine, the client systems 20 may make the determinationthat the interactions from the machine user may be malicious orunauthorized and may lock the machine user out of the mobile device.

Turning to FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C, illustrated is an example present inventionembodiment, where the client systems 20 are utilizing the sensor devices26, 28 to measure the path the performance device 40 travels between afirst point A and a second point B. FIG. 3A illustrates the plot of thepath 300 taken by the performance device 40 when the performance device40 receives inputs from a human 310 (i.e., driven by a human 310). Thepath 300 is a line connecting all of the measured data points acquiredby the sensor devices 26, 28 of the client systems 20 in monitoring thepositioning of the performance device 40 as it travels between the firstpoint A and the second point B. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, the path 300is not a straight line between the first point A and the second point B,and the path 300 includes a series of undulations, curves, and/ordeviations 305. The deviations 305 of the path 300 of the performancedevice 40 may represent the slight deviations of the performance device40 within a lane of a road between first point A and second point B,which are a result of rotations of the steering wheel by the human 310of the performance device 40 (i.e., drifting back and forth within alane).

FIG. 3B may either illustrate the path 320 taken by the performancedevice 40 when the performance device 40 receives inputs from a machine330 or the calculated expected path 320 taken by the performance device40 when the performance device 40 is receiving inputs from a machine330. As previously explained, the calculated expected path 320 iscalculated by the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10when the server systems 10 receive measured data points of theperformance device 40 from the client systems 20. As previouslyexplained, the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10 maycalculate the expected machine based path by accessing knowledge of theperformance device 40 and the path between first point A and secondpoint B from database 17 when that information is stored in database 17.The behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10 may alsocalculate the expected machine based path 320 by plotting a best fitline to the data points or line representing path 300, which is based onthe data points measured by the sensor devices 26, 28 of the clientsystems 20.

FIG. 3C illustrates the comparison of the measured path 310 depicted inFIG. 3A and the calculated expected machine path 320 depicted in FIG.3B, where the measured path 310 is overlaid onto the calculated expectedmachine path 320. As illustrated in FIG. 3C, the behavior analysismodule 18 of the server systems 10 would calculate or determine thatthere is a large variance between the measured path 300 and thecalculated expected machine path 320. As further illustrated in FIG. 3C,the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10 can furtherdetermine that the deviations 305 of the measured path 300 from thecalculated expected machine path 320 do not represent or contain anypattern with respect to the calculated expected machine path 320. Fromthese determinations and calculations, the behavior analysis module 18and the actor determination module 19 would make the determination thata human provided or generated the inputs to the performance device 40 asthe performance device 40 traveled between first point A and secondpoint B.

With reference now to FIG. 4, procedural flow chart 400 depictsoperations (e.g., of the behavior analysis module 18 and the actordetermination module 19 of the server systems 10, and the activityperformance module of the client systems 20) for generating machinebehavior for an entity, where the generated machine behavior mimics orsimulates human behavior of an entity. Machine generated behavior of anentity that simulates human generated behavior of the same or similarentity may be utilized to give the impression that a machine controlledentity is being controlled by a human. Machine generated behavior of anentity that simulates human generated behavior of the same or similarentity may be utilized to provide comfort to humans operating around andinteracting with the entity.

Initially, at step 402, the server systems 10 may utilize the behavioranalysis module 18 to calculate an expected machine based behavior for aspecific activity. As previously explained, the server systems 10 may beable to calculate expected machine based behavior for a specificactivity in multiple ways. In one present invention embodiment, theserver systems 10 may have knowledge of the system or entity that willbe completing the activity, as well as knowledge of the activity to becompleted. The data of the system or entity and the data of the activityto be completed may both be stored in the database 17, which the serversystems 10 may access to acquire the data. In another embodiment of thepresent invention, the behavior analysis module 18 may calculate theexpected machine behavior by applying a linear, curve, or function modelto previously received data points that were measured by the sensordevices 26, 28 of the client systems 20 of an entity completing the sameor similar activity.

At step 404, the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10determine the steps that are required to complete the machine behavior.Some activities may require a larger amount of steps that must becompleted when compared to other activities. For example, when theactivity to be completed is the entry of a password into a securitysystem to access data, the only steps to be completed are the entry ofeach character of the password. In another example, however, when theactivity to be completed is a self-driving vehicle traveling between afirst point and a second point, a large number of steps must becompleted, such as, but not limited to, acceleration events,deceleration events, braking events, detecting objections, turningevents, etc.

At step 406, the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10determine the target value(s) for completing each required step of theactivity. Depending on the activity being completed, the target value(s)for completing each required step may be, but are not limited to,positioning along a path, velocity/speed, distance along a path,temperature, time, altitude, entry into a data field, etc. For somesteps, only one target value may be required for completing each step ofthe activity. Other steps may include multiple target values thatrequired for completing each step of the activity. For example, when theactivity to be completed is the entry of a password into a securitysystem to access data, target values for completing a step may be thecharacter to be entered for a character position in a password and thetiming of the entry of the character with respect to the entry of theprevious character of the password. In another example, however, whenthe activity to be completed is a self-driving vehicle traveling betweena first point and a second point, target values for completing a stepmay be the positioning of the self-driving vehicle along a road or thevelocity of the self-driving vehicle on a particular road.

At step 408, the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10adds a randomized element(s) to the target value(s) based on aprobability distribution with a variance value of N for each steprequired to complete the activity. By adding randomized element(s) tothe target value(s), the calculated expected machine based behavior forthe activity is modified. The behavior analysis module 18 of the serversystems 10 may acquire the variance value N from the actor determinationmodule 19 of the server systems 10, where the variance value N is thethreshold value of the variance used to determine if measured behaviorof an entity is being controlled by a machine or a human. As previouslyexplained, when the calculated variance between the calculated machinebased behavior or performance of the entity and the measured behavior orperformance of the entity is greater than the variance value N, theactor determination module 19 determines that the measured behavior orperformance of the entity is generated by a human. Thus, when thebehavior analysis module 18 is inputting the randomized element(s) intothe target value(s) for each step, where the randomized element(s) arebased on the probability distribution with variance value N, thebehavior analysis module 18 is modifying the calculated expected machinebased behavior to a calculated and modified machine based behavior witha variance between the calculated expected machine based behavior andthe calculated and modified machine based behavior. Adding therandomized element(s) for the target value(s) of each step makes thevariance between the calculated expected machine based behavior and thecalculated and modified machine based behavior equal to or greater thanthe variance value N, which gives the calculated and modified machinebased behavior for the activity the appearance of human based behavior.

Once the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10 createsthe calculated and modified machine based behavior for the entity, theserver systems 10, at step 410, send the calculated and modified machinebased behavior to the client systems 20. The client systems 20 mayutilize the activity performance module 24 to complete or perform theactivity in the manner intended by the calculated and modified machinebased behavior. In another embodiment, the server systems 10 may sendthe calculated and modified machine based behavior to the performingdevices 40 so that the performing devices 40 may utilize the activityperformance module 42 to complete or perform the activity in the mannerintended by the calculated and modified machine based behavior. Theserver systems 10 may send the calculated and modified machine basedbehavior to the client systems 20 and/or the performance devices 40 vianetwork 30.

For example, when the client systems 20 are self-driving vehicles, andthe activity to be completed is traveling between the first point A andthe second point B illustrated in FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C, the process 400of calculating the modified machine based behavior adds variation intothe path taken by the self-driving vehicle. As illustrated in FIG. 3B,the calculated machine based path 320 of a self-driving car travelingfrom first point A to second point B is a straight line. However, theprocess 400 would calculate a modified machine based behavior that addvariance to the path 320, where the self-driving vehicle would take apath between first point A and second point B that contains undulationsand deviations 305, similar to that of the path 300 illustrated in FIG.3A. Other variations of the calculated machine based path 320 couldinclude variations in velocity of the self-driving vehicle, because whentraveling between two locations, a machine would not vary the speed ofthe self-driving vehicle as much as a human would vary the speed of avehicle.

In another example, when the client systems 20 are a security system setup to receive a password for access to data, the process 400 ofcalculating the modified machine based behavior adds variation into theentry of the password to give the appearance as if a person wasattempting to type in a password. The calculated machine based behaviorof entering the password may enter all of the characters of the passwordas fast as possible, and with uniform timing between the entries of eachof the characters of the password. For this example, however, theprocess 400 would calculate a modified machine based behavior that addsvariance to the password entry. Thus, the modified machine basedbehavior would vary the timing between the entries of each passwordcharacter. The modified machine based behavior would also enter thepassword at a slower pace than that of the calculated machine basedbehavior. In addition, the modified machine based behavior may evenenter a wrong character for the password, to then delete the wrongcharacter and reenter the correct character. These variations caused bythe modified machine based behavior would give the appearance to asystem or entity monitoring the entry of the password for the securitysystem that a human is entering the password.

In yet another example, when the client systems 20 are a mobile deviceconfigured to receive and allow human interactions (i.e., swiping of thetouch screen, depressing of the buttons, etc.), the process 400 ofcalculating the modified machine based behavior adds variation into theinteractions with the mobile device to give the appearance as if aperson was interacting with the mobile device. The calculated machinebased behavior for interacting with the mobile device may cause thetouch screen of the mobile device to be swiped in one direction at acertain speed or velocity not typically exerted by a human interactingwith the mobile device. The modified machine based behavior may causethe touch screen to be swiped as a slower speed when compared with thatof the calculated machine based behavior. In addition, the modifiedmachine based behavior may cause the touch screen to be swiped in avaried manner that is not a uniform motion in one direction. Themodified machine based behavior may even cause the touch screen may evenbe partially swiped toward one direction, where the swipe action may becanceled or stopped before fully completing a swipe action and thenrecommenced to complete the full swipe action. These variations causedby the modified machine based behavior would give the appearance to asystem or entity monitoring the interactions with the mobile devicesthat a human is interacting with the mobile devices.

With reference now to FIG. 5, procedural flowchart 500 depictsoperations (e.g., of behavior collection module 22, behavior analysismodule 18, and actor determination module 19) of the server systems 10and the client systems 20 for determining a type of actor performing anactivity. At step 502, the client systems 20 utilize the internal sensordevices 26 and/or the external sensor devices 28 to monitor an activitybeing completed or performed by the client systems 20 and/or theperformance devices 40. The behavior collection module 22 of the clientsystems 20 utilize the sensor devices 26, 28 to monitor and observe thebehavior of the client systems 20 and the performance devices 40 as theycomplete and perform an activity. At step 504, the behavior collectionmodule 22 of the client systems 20 may compile the data received andrecorded by the sensor devices 26, 28 to produce a series of activityreadings over a dimension. The readings may represent the behavior ofthe entity (e.g., client systems 20, performance devices 40) over adimension (e.g., velocity, positioning, temperature, etc.). The clientsystems 20 may send, via network 30, the activity readings to the serversystems 10.

At step 506, the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10generates reference readings based on a machine performing the activitymeasured and monitored by the client systems 20. The reference readingsbased on a machine performing the activity are the calculated machinebased behavior or performance of the activity. As previously explained,the server systems 10 may have knowledge of the system or entity thatcompleted the activity, as well as knowledge of the activity that wascompleted, and the behavior analysis module 18 may utilize thisknowledge to calculate an expected machine based behavior or performanceof the activity. In another embodiment of the present invention, thebehavior analysis module 18 may calculate the expected machine behaviorby applying a linear, curve, or function model to the recently receivedactivity readings that were measured by the sensor devices 26, 28 of theclient systems 20.

At step 508, the behavior analysis module 18 of the server systems 10compares the measured activity readings to the reference readings. Then,at step 510, the behavior analysis module 18 determines a variancebetween the activity readings and the reference readings. In comparingthe two readings, the behavior analysis module 18 calculates a varianceor standard deviation between the measured activity readings and thereference readings. After determining the variance or standarddeviation, the server systems 10, at step 512, may utilize the actordetermination module 19 to determine the type of actor by comparing thecalculated variance with a threshold. In the event the calculatedvariance exceeds the threshold, the actor determination module 19 wouldmake the determination that the client systems 20 were monitoring theperformance of a human completing the activity. In the event that thecalculated variance does not exceed the threshold, the actordetermination module 19 would make the determination that the clientsystems 20 were monitoring the performance of a machine completing theactivity. As previously explained, the threshold may be a predeterminedvalue, or may be calculated by the actor determination module based onthe knowledge of the activity being performed. In some embodiments, thethreshold may vary between different activities.

The techniques provided herein have a number of advantages. As oneexample, the techniques enable a system or user to determine the type ofactor controlling another entity performing an activity by merelymonitoring or observing the behavior of the entity. By providing systemsand devices with determinations of the type of actor performing anactivity, the systems and devices can provide enhanced userinteractions, while still safely operating with and around humans andother devices. In addition, the techniques also provide an increasedlevel of security to systems and devices, especially in detectingmalicious attempts to access devices or data systems.

Moreover, the techniques provided herein also provide an automatedsystem that may be configured to act similar to human behavior. Humansoften fear the unknown, and interacting with some automated systems(i.e., self-driving vehicle) may incite fear into humans. Automatedsystems that simulate human behavior, however, enable an automatedsystem to perform activities and interact with humans without incitingthat fear. This ability may enable the quicker and smootherimplementation of automated systems into everyday lives without beingnoticed by those interacting with the automated systems.

It will be appreciated that the embodiments described above andillustrated in the drawings represent only a few of the many ways ofimplementing embodiments for determining a type of actor performing anactivity.

The environment of the present invention embodiments may include anynumber of computer or other processing systems (e.g., client or end-usersystems, server systems, performance devices, etc.) and databases orother repositories arranged in any desired fashion, where the presentinvention embodiments may be applied to any desired type of computingenvironment (e.g., cloud computing, client-server, network computing,mainframe, stand-alone systems, etc.). The computer or other processingsystems employed by the present invention embodiments may be implementedby any number of any personal or other type of computer or processingsystem (e.g., desktop, laptop, PDA, mobile devices, etc.), and mayinclude any commercially available operating system and any combinationof commercially available and custom software (e.g., browser software,communications software, server software, behavior analysis module 18,actor determination module 19, behavior collection module 22, activityperformance modules 24, 42, etc.). These systems may include any typesof monitors and input devices (e.g., keyboard, mouse, voice recognition,etc.) to enter and/or view information.

It is to be understood that the software (e.g., behavior analysis module18, actor determination module 19, behavior collection module 22,activity performance modules 24, 42, etc.) of the present inventionembodiments may be implemented in any desired computer language andcould be developed by one of ordinary skill in the computer arts basedon the functional descriptions contained in the specification and flowcharts illustrated in the drawings. Further, any references herein ofsoftware performing various functions generally refer to computersystems or processors performing those functions under software control.The computer systems of the present invention embodiments mayalternatively be implemented by any type of hardware and/or otherprocessing circuitry.

The various functions of the computer or other processing systems may bedistributed in any manner among any number of software and/or hardwaremodules or units, processing or computer systems and/or circuitry, wherethe computer or processing systems may be disposed locally or remotelyof each other and communicate via any suitable communications medium(e.g., LAN, WAN, Intranet, Internet, hardwire, modem connection,wireless, etc.). For example, the functions of the present inventionembodiments may be distributed in any manner among the variousend-user/client and server systems, and/or any other intermediaryprocessing devices. The software and/or algorithms described above andillustrated in the flow charts may be modified in any manner thataccomplishes the functions described herein. In addition, the functionsin the flow charts or description may be performed in any order thataccomplishes a desired operation.

The software of the present invention embodiments (e.g., behavioranalysis module 18, actor determination module 19, behavior collectionmodule 22, activity performance modules 24, 42) may be available on anon-transitory computer useable medium (e.g., magnetic or opticalmediums, magneto-optic mediums, floppy diskettes, CD-ROM, DVD, memorydevices, etc.) of a stationary or portable program product apparatus ordevice for use with stand-alone systems or systems connected by anetwork or other communications medium.

The communication network may be implemented by any number of any typeof communications network (e.g., LAN, WAN, Internet, Intranet, VPN,etc.). The computer or other processing systems of the present inventionembodiments may include any conventional or other communications devicesto communicate over the network via any conventional or other protocols.The computer or other processing systems may utilize any type ofconnection (e.g., wired, wireless, etc.) for access to the network.Local communication media may be implemented by any suitablecommunication media (e.g., local area network (LAN), hardwire, wirelesslink, Intranet, etc.).

The system may employ any number of any conventional or other databases,data stores or storage structures (e.g., files, databases, datastructures, data or other repositories, etc.) to store information(e.g., sensor device readings, calculated expected machine behavior andperformance, activity profiles, variance calculations, threshold values,etc.). The database system may be implemented by any number of anyconventional or other databases, data stores or storage structures(e.g., files, databases, data structures, data or other repositories,etc.) to store information (e.g., sensor device readings, calculatedexpected machine behavior and performance, activity profiles, variancecalculations, threshold values, etc.). The database system may beincluded within or coupled to the server and/or client systems. Thedatabase systems and/or storage structures may be remote from or localto the computer or other processing systems, and may store any desireddata (e.g., sensor device readings, calculated expected machine behaviorand performance, activity profiles, variance calculations, thresholdvalues, etc.).

The present invention embodiments may employ any number of any type ofuser interface (e.g., Graphical User Interface (GUI), command-line,prompt, etc.) for obtaining or providing information (e.g., sensor data,modeling data, etc.), where the interface may include any informationarranged in any fashion. The interface may include any number of anytypes of input or actuation mechanisms (e.g., buttons, icons, fields,boxes, links, etc.) disposed at any locations to enter/displayinformation and initiate desired actions via any suitable input devices(e.g., mouse, keyboard, touchscreen, etc.). The interface screens mayinclude any suitable actuators (e.g., links, tabs, etc.) to navigatebetween the screens in any fashion.

The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particularembodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. Asused herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended toinclude the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicatesotherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises”,“comprising”, “includes”, “including”, “has”, “have”, “having”, “with”and the like, when used in this specification, specify the presence ofstated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/orcomponents, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or moreother features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components,and/or groups thereof.

The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of allmeans or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended toinclude any structure, material, or act for performing the function incombination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. Thedescription of the present invention has been presented for purposes ofillustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive orlimited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications andvariations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the artwithout departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Theembodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain theprinciples of the invention and the practical application, and to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention forvarious embodiments with various modifications as are suited to theparticular use contemplated.

The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present inventionhave been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intendedto be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Manymodifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skillin the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the describedembodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain theprinciples of the embodiments, the practical application or technicalimprovement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodimentsdisclosed herein.

The present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computerprogram product at any possible technical detail level of integration.The computer program product may include a computer readable storagemedium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereonfor causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that canretain and store instructions for use by an instruction executiondevice. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but isnot limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device,an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, asemiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of thecomputer readable storage medium includes the following: a portablecomputer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portablecompact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD),a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such aspunch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructionsrecorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. Acomputer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construedas being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freelypropagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagatingthrough a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulsespassing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmittedthrough a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can bedownloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computerreadable storage medium or to an external computer or external storagedevice via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, awide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprisecopper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wirelesstransmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/oredge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in eachcomputing/processing device receives computer readable programinstructions from the network and forwards the computer readable programinstructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium withinthe respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations ofthe present invention may be assembler instructions,instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions,machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions,state-setting data, configuration data for integrated circuitry, oreither source code or object code written in any combination of one ormore programming languages, including an object oriented programminglanguage such as Smalltalk, C++, or the like, and procedural programminglanguages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programminglanguages. The computer readable program instructions may executeentirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as astand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partlyon a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. Inthe latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user'scomputer through any type of network, including a local area network(LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to anexternal computer (for example, through the Internet using an InternetService Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including,for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gatearrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute thecomputer readable program instructions by utilizing state information ofthe computer readable program instructions to personalize the electroniccircuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to aprocessor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, orother programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, suchthat the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computeror other programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructionsmay also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can directa computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or otherdevices to function in a particular manner, such that the computerreadable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises anarticle of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects ofthe function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram blockor blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other deviceto cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer,other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computerimplemented process, such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods, and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternativeimplementations, the functions noted in the blocks may occur out of theorder noted in the Figures. For example, two blocks shown in successionmay, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks maysometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon thefunctionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of theblock diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocksin the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implementedby special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specifiedfunctions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardwareand computer instructions.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of determining a type of actorperforming an activity comprising: monitoring a device receivingcontrols from the actor for performance of the activity, via a sensor,to produce activity readings over a dimension, wherein the deviceincludes one of a vehicle and a computer system and the activityreadings represent behavior of the device in response to control by theactor; comparing the activity readings to reference readings generatedbased on a machine controlling the device for performing the activity todetermine a variance between the activity readings and referencereadings; determining the type of actor controlling the device based ona comparison of the variance with a threshold; adding randomizedelements to the reference readings based on a probability distributionto produce simulated readings of the activity performed by an organism;and utilizing the simulated readings to direct the machine to controlthe device to perform the activity in a manner simulating control of thedevice by the organism.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the type ofactor includes one of a machine and an organism.
 3. The method of claim1, wherein the activity includes one selected from a group of: operatingthe vehicle to travel along a path, operating the computer system toaccess data, and operating an interface to access the device.
 4. Themethod of claim 1, wherein determining the variance includes: analyzingthe activity and reference readings to define patterns.
 5. The method ofclaim 4, further comprising: producing a confidence level for thedetermined type of actor.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein thedimension includes one of time, a distance, and a path.
 7. A processingsystem for determining a type of actor performing an activitycomprising: a processor configured to: monitor a device receivingcontrols from the actor for performance of the activity, via a sensor,to produce activity readings over a dimension, wherein the deviceincludes one of a vehicle and a computer system and the activityreadings represent behavior of the device in response to control by theactor; compare the activity readings to reference readings generatedbased on a machine controlling the device for performing the activity todetermine a variance between the activity readings and referencereadings; determine the type of actor controlling the device based on acomparison of the variance with a threshold; add randomized elements tothe reference readings based on a probability distribution to producesimulated readings of the activity performed by an organism; and utilizethe simulated readings to direct the machine to control the device toperform the activity in a manner simulating control of the device by theorganism.
 8. The processing system of claim 7, wherein the type of actorincludes one of a machine and an organism.
 9. The processing system ofclaim 7, wherein the activity includes one selected from a group of:operating the vehicle to travel along a path, operating the computersystem to access data, and operating an interface to access the device.10. The processing system of claim 7, wherein in determining thevariance, the processor is further configured to: analyze the activityand reference readings to define patterns.
 11. The processing system ofclaim 10, wherein the processor is further configured to: produce aconfidence level for the determined type of actor.
 12. The processingsystem of claim 7, wherein the dimension includes one of time, adistance, and a path.
 13. A computer program product for determining atype of actor performing an activity, the computer program productcomprising a computer readable storage medium having computer readableprogram code embodied therewith, the computer readable program codeexecutable by at least one processor to cause the at least one processorto: monitor a device receiving controls from the actor for performanceof the activity, via a sensor, to produce activity readings over adimension, wherein the device includes one of a vehicle and a computersystem and the activity readings represent behavior of the device inresponse to control by the actor; compare the activity readings toreference readings generated based on a machine controlling the devicefor performing the activity to determine a variance between the activityreadings and reference readings; determine the type of actor controllingthe device based on a comparison of the variance with a threshold; addrandomized elements to the reference readings based on a probabilitydistribution to produce simulated readings of the activity performed byan organism; and utilize the simulated readings to direct the machine tocontrol the device to perform the activity in a manner simulatingcontrol of the device by the organism.
 14. The computer program productof claim 13, wherein the type of actor includes one of a machine and anorganism.
 15. The computer program product of claim 13, wherein theactivity includes one selected from a group of: operating the vehicle totravel along a path, operating the computer system to access data, andoperating an interface to access the device.
 16. The computer programproduct of claim 13, wherein in determining the variance, the computerreadable program code is further configured to cause the at least oneprocessor to: analyze the activity and reference readings to definepatterns.
 17. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein thecomputer readable program code is further configured to cause the atleast one processor to: produce a confidence level for the determinedtype of actor.